The Homeschooling Revolution


 




About
E-Mail Me









Links
A - Z
About:Homeschooling
AHA
Andrea
Anne
Answers.com
APMFormulators: B.H.C.
Blog Cruiser
Bonnie
Capitalist League
Carlotta
Carmon
Carol
Chad
Charity Grace
CoH Schedule
Darrell Dow
Davis Family
Dr. Dave
Dominion Family
Dortignac Family
Ed./Homeschool News
Generalismo
Gluten Free Krums
Greenville C.A.
Will Grigg
Happy as Kings
Happy Housewife
HomeschoolBuzz
Homeschool Cafe
Justin
Key Words
Let a Woman Learn
Let's Play Math
Lincoln
Lindafay
Master Blogs
Modern Mother
One-Sixteenth
R&C on the Fly
Russ Reeves
Shan
The Mature Kid
Today's Lessons
TnHomeEd
Valerie
Why Homeschool
Yedies/Judy Aron

Allan Wall
Ben
Buchanan Blog
Christopher
Dawn
Domestic Tranquility
Jami
Lee
Liberal Utopia
Michael
Ok. Libertarian Party
Oliver
Peter/Vdare
Reformed Covenanter
Rob
Ruminations
Steve/ESR

Family

Reepicheep


Albert


The Ironman


Dan & Wid III




The Homeschooling Revolution



December 09, 2005

In Court, Part III

Ready for the answers to the "Law in a Flash" questions?

Criminal law: No. India was under no duty to act, believe it or not. Her intense dislike for Ima is not relevant, since bad thoughts alone are not punishable.

Contracts: No, because Dorothy's statement was not an offer, just a statement of intent. To constitute a contract, there must be an offer by one person to another.

Torts: Jefferson. While battery requires a harmful or offensive contact, the backslap doesn't qualify since the gesture is a common one in our society and, generally, is not an considered offensive act.

Did you miss a couple? If so, it's probably because you decided the situation based on the Golden Rule, the American neighborly way, or common-sense as opposed to black-letter law. Understandable.